Internet Workstation

Edition and Publication

Edition and Publication:
< Natural Gas and Oil > Editorial Department
Hosted by:
China Petroleum Engineering & Construction Corporation Southwest Company
Authorized by:
China Petroleum Engineering & Construction Corporation
Co-hosted by:
Overseas Research Center of Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development
Editor in Chief:
Du Tonglin
Vice Editor in Chief:
Tang Xiaoyong,Pu Liming
Address:
No.6, Shenghua Road, High-tech District, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Postal Code:
610041
Tel:
028-86014709
028-86014500
Email:
cnpc-ngo@cnpc.com.cn
Issue:ISSN 1006-5539
          CN 51-1183/TE

Links

    Your Position :Home->Past Journals Catalog->2023 Vol.4

    Risk assessment of non-metallic oil and gas pipeline based on Kent method
    Author of the article:LI Chunyu1, FENG Xinyuan1, HE Huanting1, ZHAO Yongping1, LI Cheng1, QIAO Boxiang2
    Author's Workplace:1. Drilling & Production Technology Research Institute of PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, Dunhuang, Gansu, 736200, China; 2. No.1 Oil Production Plant of PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, Mangya, Qinghai, 816400, China
    Key Words:Non-metallic pipe; Kent method; Semi-quantitative risk assessment; Oil and gas gathering and transmission pipeline; Risk factor; Pipeline failure
    Abstract:

    Risk assessment is an important content and basis of pipeline integrity management. With the continuous progress and development of the integrity management of oil and gas field gathering and transmission pipelines, the lack of mature risk assessment methods for nonmetallic pipelines has become increasingly prominent. Based on the analysis of failure risk factors of non-metallic pipelines and statistical results of failures in an oilfield, a semi-quantitative risk assessment method based on the Kent method for non-metallic oil and gas transmission pipelines was established. The evaluation index of failure possibility includes 49 evaluation indices from five aspects:third-party damage, operating environment, design, manufacture and construction, mal-operation and geological hazards. The failure consequence indicators covers 6 aspects, including short-term damage caused by the medium, maximum leakage of the medium, dispersion of the medium, the affected parties, social impact, and the impact of supply interruption on downstream users, with a total of 12 specific evaluation indicators. The failure probability index weighting coefficient and evaluation index score are optimally determined by expert scoring method. This risk assessment method of non-metallic pipelines lays a foundation for the implementation of risk assessment of non-metallic gathering and transmission pipelines in oil and gasfields.

    CopyRight©2025Natural Gas and Oil Editorial Office Reserved 京ICP备11013578号-1